New naming scheme for patches after MG04/10.3.01

I suppose you refer to this thread ? Adding the extra zero makes sense, but perhaps 'disrupts' the sort order on older files (0906 etc.) that still don't have the extra zero.

Arjen van Vliet said I suppose you refer to this thread ? Adding the extra zero makes sense, but perhaps 'disrupts' the sort order on older files (0906 etc.) that still don't have the extra zero.  

Hi Arjen Yes, I did refer to the thread under technical announcements. But there I could not add a response And about the extra "0". As the schema is totaly new for the patch-files, it does not disrupt any older naming conventions Ingo

Hi Arjen, but the old patches start with the platform (w32...), so we have a break in sorting already between new and old patches. So when we start a brand new naming pattern, Ingos suggestion is worth to consider (even if it may take some time getting used to "U09")

ulrich-merkel said Hi Arjen, So when we start a brand new naming pattern, Ingos suggestion is worth to consider (even if it may take some time getting used to "U09")  

  And U09nnn will be the branch to use for a long, very long time. Or?